<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Debt Markets in India</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msjcapital.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msjcapital.com</link>
	<description>Understanding debt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:14:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>DEBT MARKETS JOURNEY POST BUDGET</title>
		<link>http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/03/03/debt-markets-journey-post-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/03/03/debt-markets-journey-post-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 07:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunil Jhaveri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debt Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msjcapital.com/?p=634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have not written on debt markets since almost  January 2010 post the Credit Policy Review. One of the reasons was that I was  waiting for the announcement of Budget and subsequent borrowing calendar. I had  hoped that we will have a clear path in debt markets based on the Budget  [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2009/11/03/debt-markets-post-rbi-policy-review-on-october-272009/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: DEBT MARKETS POST RBI POLICY REVIEW ON OCTOBER 27&#8242;2009'>DEBT MARKETS POST RBI POLICY REVIEW ON OCTOBER 27&#8242;2009</a> <small>RBI announced Credit policy Review on October 27’2009; wherein RBI...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2009/07/06/budget-2009-2010-implications-on-debt-markets/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUDGET 2009-2010-IMPLICATIONS ON DEBT MARKETS'>BUDGET 2009-2010-IMPLICATIONS ON DEBT MARKETS</a> <small>Budget 2009-2010 was presented today in the Parliament. Some of...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2009/03/16/debt-markets-post-cancellation-of-rs12000-cr-auction-by-rbi/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: DEBT MARKETS POST CANCELLATION OF Rs.12000 CR AUCTION BY RBI'>DEBT MARKETS POST CANCELLATION OF Rs.12000 CR AUCTION BY RBI</a> <small>RBI cancelled auction of Rs.12000 crs which was slated for...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify">I have not written on debt markets since almost  January 2010 post the Credit Policy Review. One of the reasons was that I was  waiting for the announcement of Budget and subsequent borrowing calendar. I had  hoped that we will have a clear path in debt markets based on the Budget  announcements and borrowing calendar announcements. </p>
<p align="justify">However, this event (read Budget) has had an effect of  creating more ripples in an otherwise calm market. There have been many  announcements (like petrol price hike, excise duty hike, etc) which will impact  inflation &amp; debt markets in the short run but will go a long way in  improving fiscal deficit numbers in the long run.</p>
<p align="justify"><strong><u>Let us analyse the debt  market situation of last couple of years v/s what is likely to be going  forward:</u></strong></p>
<div align="justify">
<ul>
<li>There was  Fiscal stimulus announcements followed by expansionary monetary policy measures  over past couple of years to fight the slowing down economy</li>
<li>Monetary  policy measures included aggressive rate cuts alongwith reduction of CRR</li>
<li>Inflation  had actually gone into near zero/negative territory for quite a major portion  of the year</li>
<li>To  counter huge borrowing programme due to Fiscal Stimulus package, RBI had a  clear OMO calendar to ensure smooth sailing of these auctions</li>
<li>There was  huge liquidity overhang of more than Rs.1 lac cr due to aversion to taking  risk, economic slowdown &amp; subsequent lack of credit offtake </li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="justify"><strong><u>As against the above,  going forward debt markets will have to weather following hurdles:</u></strong></p>
<div align="justify">
<ul>
<li>Fiscal  stimulus roll back (though good from the point of view of better revenue  collection figures) of hike in excise duty to add fuel to already blazing  inflation numbers</li>
<li>Petrol  price hike (again excellent in the long run to reduce petroleum subsidy &amp;  fiscal deficit numbers), extremely inflationary in the short run</li>
<li>Hike in  CRR by 75 bps in last policy review will put premium on liquidity going  forward. Reverse REPO figures have come down from nearly a high of Rs.1 lac cr  to currently at close to Rs.30,000 crs &amp; likely to reduce further post the  advance tax outflows on March 15</li>
<li>Due to  hike in CRR, very unlikely that RBI will have a definite OMO calendar (which  will be counter productive to this hike). Hence, a huge borrowing programme  without any support from RBI (in terms of giving back liquidity to the market  through OMO) will be very difficult task for the debt markets</li>
<li>To top it  all, old benchmark 6.35% 2020 will be phased out soon making it illiquid as  auctions going forward will be of new benchmark papers. Almost Rs.45-50,000 crs  of old benchmark will come up for trading; thereby putting downward pressure on  its pricing</li>
<li>Inflation  likely to go beyond RBI estimates of 8.50% &amp; may peak off at around 10%;  thereby forcing RBI to increase benchmark rates in April 2010 policy review.  Inflation can only settle around 5% mark somewhere in August/September due to  base effect coming into play</li>
<li>RBI has  clearly indicated that the borrowing calendar would be front loaded &amp;  almost Rs.3.50 lac crs would be borrowed in the first six months, which is almost Rs.50,000 crs p.m., which  is almost Rs.10-12000 crs every week. Hence, borrowing calendar week on week  will be similar to last year’s except for the comfort of having an OMO calendar  to support the weekly auctions</li>
<li>Another  uncertainty which can creep in going forward is the state of monsoon. If we  have a similar year as last year wherein the monsoon was erratic with drought  like situation in certain areas (main reasons for extremely high food inflation  in the current year), debt markets will have no respite from the already heavy  burden of huge borrowing calendar (without any monetary measures support from  RBI)</li>
<li>Also  there is demand/supply mismatch in the Fiscal 2010-11 in favour of supply which  can drag G sec prices down</li>
<li>Only with  lowering Fiscal numbers &amp; growing GDP numbers in subsequent years will this  be corrected &amp; go in favour of more demand &amp; less supply over next  couple of years</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="justify"><strong><u>Taking into account the  above factors one would be best advised to stay away from taking any long term investment  calls in the debt markets at current levels. Interest rates have started  hardening both at the shorter end (more so in this segment of the yield curve)  as well as on the longer end. 1 year CDs which were quoting at 5.75% in January  2010 have already hardened to 7% plus in a very short span. 5 year AAA  Corporate Bonds’ yield has hardened to 8.75% from a low of 8.40% pre Budget  &amp; 10 year benchmark has marginally gone up from 7.80% to 7.90-7.95%. </u></strong></p>
<p align="justify"><strong><u>With imminent hike in  inflation numbers, there will be an imminent rate hike in the near future. Add  to this the liquidity woes &amp; huge weekly borrowing calendar; benchmark  rates in such a scenario can breach 8% mark soon &amp; may hover between 8.25%  to 8.50% levels in the near future. Hence, instead of trying to outguess RBI  moves or debt markets, one can safely invest in say 3 month FMPs at or around  6% levels, go beyond March 2010 &amp; let inflation peak off somewhere at 10%  levels between April &amp; June 2010 before taking a long term call on debt  markets at those levels. </u></strong></p>
<p align="justify">Both for technical (good opportunity to invest at  higher yields as well as lower borrowing programme in second half) &amp;  fundamental reasons (base effect on inflation bringing the inflation numbers to  around 5% in August/September 2010) it will make an immense sense to invest in  long term Income/GILT schemes at that point in time. </p>
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2009/11/03/debt-markets-post-rbi-policy-review-on-october-272009/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: DEBT MARKETS POST RBI POLICY REVIEW ON OCTOBER 27&#8242;2009'>DEBT MARKETS POST RBI POLICY REVIEW ON OCTOBER 27&#8242;2009</a> <small>RBI announced Credit policy Review on October 27’2009; wherein RBI...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2009/07/06/budget-2009-2010-implications-on-debt-markets/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUDGET 2009-2010-IMPLICATIONS ON DEBT MARKETS'>BUDGET 2009-2010-IMPLICATIONS ON DEBT MARKETS</a> <small>Budget 2009-2010 was presented today in the Parliament. Some of...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2009/03/16/debt-markets-post-cancellation-of-rs12000-cr-auction-by-rbi/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: DEBT MARKETS POST CANCELLATION OF Rs.12000 CR AUCTION BY RBI'>DEBT MARKETS POST CANCELLATION OF Rs.12000 CR AUCTION BY RBI</a> <small>RBI cancelled auction of Rs.12000 crs which was slated for...</small></li>
</ol></p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/03/03/debt-markets-journey-post-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ARTICLE IN ECONOMIC TIMES DELHI</title>
		<link>http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/02/24/article-in-economic-times-delhi-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/02/24/article-in-economic-times-delhi-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunil Jhaveri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debt Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mutual Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutual fund industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msjcapital.com/?p=627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#160;
&#160;
&#160;


Related posts:Article in Economic Times Delhi  SOURCE : Economic Times &#8211; Delhi &#8211; Page 11...
Article in Economic Times Delhi  &#160; &#160; &#160; ...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/01/18/article-in-economic-times-delhi/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Article in Economic Times Delhi'>Article in Economic Times Delhi</a> <small> SOURCE : Economic Times &#8211; Delhi &#8211; Page 11...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/02/03/article-in-economic-times-delhi-2/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Article in Economic Times Delhi'>Article in Economic Times Delhi</a> <small> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; ...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.msjcapital.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Article-MFs-hardsell-MIPs.jpg"><img src="http://www.msjcapital.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Article-MFs-hardsell-MIPs-274x300.jpg" alt="" title="Article - MFs hardsell MIPs" width="274" height="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-628" /></a></p>
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/01/18/article-in-economic-times-delhi/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Article in Economic Times Delhi'>Article in Economic Times Delhi</a> <small> SOURCE : Economic Times &#8211; Delhi &#8211; Page 11...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/02/03/article-in-economic-times-delhi-2/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Article in Economic Times Delhi'>Article in Economic Times Delhi</a> <small> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; ...</small></li>
</ol></p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/02/24/article-in-economic-times-delhi-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SWP from MIP-A Powerful Investment Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/02/04/swp-from-mip-a-powerful-investment-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/02/04/swp-from-mip-a-powerful-investment-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunil Jhaveri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msjcapital.com/?p=609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every year combination of rising inflation, volatile  debt &#38; equity markets &#38; lower/ higher interest yields is creating havoc  in portfolios of an individual. An investor who wishes to have regular flow of  income; be it a retail, HNI, Pensioner or a Senior Citizen is at a loss  as to how to [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify">Every year combination of rising inflation, volatile  debt &amp; equity markets &amp; lower/ higher interest yields is creating havoc  in portfolios of an individual. An investor who wishes to have regular flow of  income; be it a retail, HNI, Pensioner or a Senior Citizen is at a loss  as to how to plan their day to day  expenditure with a matching or higher yielding investment portfolio. Either  they have to keep on reshuffling their asset classes to make their ends meet or  take unnecessary risk in their portfolio (with no guarantee of it giving  positive returns at the end of the year) to earn that extra bit of money.</p>
<p align="justify">Other alternative is parking their funds in Fixed  Deposits with some assured returns but a very tax in efficient vehicle (as the  investor will have to pay full tax on interest). Also, in FDs, funds get stuck  for a period of time like 1/2/3/5 years &amp; hence, the investor loses on  liquidity as well. Also, the principal amount at the end of the FD tenor does  not appreciate &amp; the investor gets back the same amount which he/she would  have invested at the beginning of the period. Also, many times these returns do  not even beat the inflation.</p>
<p align="justify"><strong><u>In such a scenario, the  investor who wishes to earn a regular income is at a tremendous loss in terms  of options available to him to earn regular income to meet his day to day  expenses. However, one strategy that can help an investor overcome all the  above viz:</u></strong></p>
<div align="justify">
<ul>
<li>Have regular &amp; assured  flow of income</li>
<li>Make these withdrawals tax efficient  &amp;</li>
<li>Have a possibility of enhancing the  overall portfolio value (over a period of time) </li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="justify">Is <strong><u>SYSTEMATIC  WITHDRWAL PLAN</u></strong> <strong><u>from well  managed MONTHLY INCOME PLANs</u></strong>. This tool, besides being an extremely tax  efficient way of having regular cash flow for the investor also has a  capability of enhancing the overall portfolio value (if managed well &amp;  withdrawals of the investor on an ongoing basis is less than the overall  returns of the scheme i.e. if the scheme has performed say 12% p.a. in one year  &amp; the investor has only done SWP of say 8.50% p.a.; then the investor  besides withdrawing regular sums through SWP is also enhancing their overall  portfolio value).</p>
<p align="justify"><strong><u>Following analysis of two  of the best managed MIPs viz. Reliance Monthly Income Plan &amp; ICICI  Prudential Monthly Income Plan will show case how SWPs score over traditional  FDs in terms of returns &amp; tax efficiencies over a period of time. The way  the following table are designed are based on an original investment value of  Rs.10 lacs at their respective NAVs &amp; SWP @8.50% p.a. i.e. Rs.7100/- p.m.</u></strong>  :</p>
<div align="justify">
<ul>
<li>It will  show the original investment value of Rs.10 lacs as on say Jan 2001 or Jan 2008  at the NAVs prevalent on those dates</li>
<li>It will  show the values one year hence with tax implications on SWP &amp; on FDs</li>
<li>It will  show value as on the current date i.e. January 2010 with total withdrawal from  say Jan 2001 to Jan 2010/ Jan 2008 to Jan 2010,etc, with long term/short term  capital gains tax on SWP &amp; assuming the same returns in FD, its current  value and tax implications on the same</li>
<li>Most of  the years &amp; observations , you will notice that on Year on Year basis (inspite  of SWP @8.50% p.a./i.e. Rs.7100/- pm) your principal is either higher or  marginally lower (2008 year</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="justify">being an exception as equity markets  had collapsed in that year)  from the  start &amp; the investor has paid very little tax compared to tax implications  on FD interest</p>
<div align="justify">
<ul>
<li>Most of  the years even on cumulative basis from say 2001 to 2010 or 2008 to 2010,etc  years, the current value of your investments in MIPs (inspite of having SWP  @8.50% p.a.)is higher than when the investor had started with. This also with  much lower tax implication (assuming that the investor is redeeming from MIP in  Jan 2010) than what he would have ended up paying as tax on similar interest  rate on FDs</li>
<li>Reliance  MIP data is from 2001 as the said scheme’s date of inception was November 2000  &amp; that of ICICI Prudential is from January 2004:</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="justify"><strong><u>ANALYSIS  OF RELIANCE MIP SINCE  JAN 2001:</u></strong></p>
<div align="justify">
<table width="450" border="1" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" bordercolor="#000000" style="text-align: center; margin: auto;">
<tr>
<td width="82" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>FROM</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="101" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="67" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>VALUE</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="81" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>SWP</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="60" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>TOTAL SWP</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="169" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>TAX IMPLICATION ON SWP &amp; REDEMPTION    IN JAN 2010</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="82" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-01</p>
</td>
<td width="101" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="67" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1000000</p>
</td>
<td width="81" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">7100</p>
</td>
<td width="60" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="169" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="82" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-02</p>
</td>
<td width="101" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Y ON Y</p>
</td>
<td width="67" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1,025,196</p>
</td>
<td width="81" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="60" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">85,200</p>
</td>
<td width="169" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1526</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="82" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-10</p>
</td>
<td width="101" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">CUMULATIVE</p>
</td>
<td width="67" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1,142,011</p>
</td>
<td width="81" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="60" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">766,800</p>
</td>
<td width="169" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">41161</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="82" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>IF INVESTED IN FD</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="101" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="67" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>VALUE</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="81" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>INTEREST</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="60" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="169" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="82" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-01</p>
</td>
<td width="101" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="67" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1000000</p>
</td>
<td width="81" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">7100</p>
</td>
<td width="60" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="169" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="82" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-02</p>
</td>
<td width="101" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Y ON Y</p>
</td>
<td width="67" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1000000</p>
</td>
<td width="81" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="60" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">85,200</p>
</td>
<td width="169" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">25560</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="82" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-10</p>
</td>
<td width="101" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">CUMULATIVE</p>
</td>
<td width="67" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1000000</p>
</td>
<td width="81" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="60" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">766,800</p>
</td>
<td width="169" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">230040</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p align="justify">As can be seen from above on Y on Y i.e.  from Jan 2001 to Jan 2002 value of your MIP after Rs.85,200/- as SWP is worth  Rs.11,42,011 with tax implication of only Rs.1,526 v/s tax implication of Rs.  25,560/-  in FDs . On cumulative basis  since Jan 2001 till Jan 2010, an investors has don an SWP of Rs.7,66,800/-  having total tax implication of Rs.41,161/- (including Short Term &amp; Long  Term &amp; again assuming that the investor is redeeming from MIP at CV of  Rs.11,42,011/-) v/s same interest of Rs.7,66,800/- on FD  having an a tax implication of Rs.2,30,040/-. </p>
<p align="justify"><strong><u>ANALYSIS  OF RELIANCE MIP SINCE JAN 2008: YEAR WHEN EQUITY MARKETS CRASHED:</u></strong></p>
<div align="justify">
<table width="450" border="1" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" bordercolor="#000000" style="text-align: center; margin: auto;">
<tr>
<td width="95" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>FROM</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="61" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>VALUE</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="82" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>SWP</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="65" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>TOTAL SWP</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="111" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>TAX IMPLICATION ON SWP &amp; REDEMPTION    IN JAN 2010</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>CV WITH TAX IMPLICATIONS &amp;    WITHDRWALAS</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="95" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-08</p>
</td>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="61" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1000000</p>
</td>
<td width="82" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">7100</p>
</td>
<td width="65" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="111" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="95" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-09</p>
</td>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Y ON Y</p>
</td>
<td width="61" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">896,969</p>
</td>
<td width="82" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="65" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">85,200</p>
</td>
<td width="111" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">0</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="95" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-10</p>
</td>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">CUMULATIVE</p>
</td>
<td width="61" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">916,047</p>
</td>
<td width="82" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="65" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">170,400</p>
</td>
<td width="111" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">0</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1086447</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="95" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>IF INVESTED IN FD</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="61" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>VALUE</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="82" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>INTEREST</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="65" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="111" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="95" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-08</p>
</td>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="61" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1000000</p>
</td>
<td width="82" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">7100</p>
</td>
<td width="65" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="111" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="95" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-09</p>
</td>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Y ON Y</p>
</td>
<td width="61" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1000000</p>
</td>
<td width="82" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="65" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">85,200</p>
</td>
<td width="111" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">25560</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="95" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-10</p>
</td>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">CUMULATIVE</p>
</td>
<td width="61" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1000000</p>
</td>
<td width="82" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="65" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">170,400</p>
</td>
<td width="111" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">51120</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1119280</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p align="justify">As can be seen from above on Y on Y i.e.  from Jan 2008 to Jan 2009 value of your MIP after Rs.85200/- as SWP is lower at  Rs.8,96,969/- with no tax implication (due to loss). However, on cumulative  basis from Jan 2008 to Jan 2010, value of your MIP has grown to Rs.9,16,047/-  with no tax implication (due to losses). Total value of your investment in MIP  plus withdrawal is Rs.10,86,447/- v/s total value of FDs plus interest less tax  is marginally higher at Rs.11,19,280/-</p>
<p align="justify"><strong><u>ANALYSIS  OF ICICI PRU MIP SINCE  JAN 2004:</u></strong></p>
<div align="justify">
<table width="450" border="1" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" bordercolor="#000000" style="text-align: center; margin: auto;">
<tr>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>FROM</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="85" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="57" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>VALUE</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="68" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>SWP</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="71" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>TOTAL SWP</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>TAX IMPLICATION ON SWP &amp; REDEMPTION    IN JAN 2010</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-04</p>
</td>
<td width="85" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="57" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1000000</p>
</td>
<td width="68" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">7100</p>
</td>
<td width="71" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-05</p>
</td>
<td width="85" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Y ON Y</p>
</td>
<td width="57" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">965,706</p>
</td>
<td width="68" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="71" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">85,200</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">450</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-10</p>
</td>
<td width="85" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">CUMULATIVE</p>
</td>
<td width="57" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1,215,317</p>
</td>
<td width="68" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="71" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">511,200</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">33762</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>IF INVESTED IN FD</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="85" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="57" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>VALUE</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="68" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>INTEREST</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="71" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-01</p>
</td>
<td width="85" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="57" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1000000</p>
</td>
<td width="68" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">7100</p>
</td>
<td width="71" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-02</p>
</td>
<td width="85" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Y ON Y</p>
</td>
<td width="57" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1000000</p>
</td>
<td width="68" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="71" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">85,200</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">25560</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-10</p>
</td>
<td width="85" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">CUMULATIVE</p>
</td>
<td width="57" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1000000</p>
</td>
<td width="68" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="71" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">511,200</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">153360</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p align="justify">As can be seen from above on Y on Y i.e.  from Jan 2004 to Jan 2005 value of your MIP after Rs.85,200/- as SWP is worth  Rs.9,56,706/-  with tax implication of  only Rs.450/- v/s tax implication of Rs. 25,560 in FDs . On cumulative basis  since Jan 2004 till Jan 2010, an investors has done an SWP of Rs.5,11,200/-  having total tax implication of Rs.33,762/- (including Short Term &amp; Long  Term &amp; again assuming that the investor is redeeming from MIP at CV of  Rs.12,15,317/-) v/s same interest of Rs.5,11,200/- on FD  having a tax implication of Rs.1,53,360/-. </p>
<p align="justify"><strong><u>ANALYSIS  OF ICICI PRU MIP SINCE JAN 2008: YEAR WHEN EQUITY MARKETS CRASHED:</u></strong></p>
<div align="justify">
<table width="450" border="1" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" bordercolor="#000000" style="text-align: center; margin: auto;">
<tr>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>FROM</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="77" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="55" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>VALUE</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="57" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>SWP</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="71" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>TOTAL SWP</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="120" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>TAX IMPLICATION ON SWP &amp; REDEMPTION    IN JAN 2010</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-08</p>
</td>
<td width="77" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="55" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1000000</p>
</td>
<td width="57" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">7100</p>
</td>
<td width="71" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-09</p>
</td>
<td width="77" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Y ON Y</p>
</td>
<td width="55" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1,001,096</p>
</td>
<td width="57" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="71" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">85,200</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-10</p>
</td>
<td width="77" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">CUMULATIVE</p>
</td>
<td width="55" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1,115,173</p>
</td>
<td width="57" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="71" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">170,400</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">12108</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>IF INVESTED IN FD</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="77" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="55" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>VALUE</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="57" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>INTEREST</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="71" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-08</p>
</td>
<td width="77" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="55" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1000000</p>
</td>
<td width="57" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">7100</p>
</td>
<td width="71" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-09</p>
</td>
<td width="77" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Y ON Y</p>
</td>
<td width="55" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1000000</p>
</td>
<td width="57" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="71" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">85,200</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">25560</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="103" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan-10</p>
</td>
<td width="77" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">CUMULATIVE</p>
</td>
<td width="55" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1000000</p>
</td>
<td width="57" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="71" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">170,400</p>
</td>
<td width="120" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">51120</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p align="justify">As can be seen from above on Y on Y i.e.  from Jan 2008 to Jan 2009 value of your MIP after Rs.85200/- as SWP is  at Rs.10,01,096/- with no tax implication v/s  similar interest on FD of Rs.85,200/- having a tax implication of Rs.25,560/-.  However, on cumulative basis from Jan 2008 to Jan 2010, value of your MIP has  grown to Rs.11,15,173/- with  tax  implication of Rs.12,108/- after SWP of Rs.1,70,400/- v/s same interest of  Rs.1,70,400/- on FD having tax implication of Rs.51,120/- </p>
<p align="justify"><strong><u>CONCLUSION:</u></strong></p>
<div align="justify">
<ul>
<li>Over  longer period of time under SWP, there are chances of withdrawing a decent sum  of money at a reasonable rate of yield every month without the overall value  going negative with lesser tax implication than if you would have earned the  same returns in FDs over the same period</li>
<li>Though  over shorter periods of time (when equity markets are not doing well); an  investor might dip into his principal for some time, good performance in  equities at a later date will more than make up for that dip with greater tax  efficiency</li>
<li>Hence,  the said strategy of SWP (assuming a reasonable yield of between 7-8% p.a.)  through well managed MIPs can be an effective way of having a regular cash flow  without much downside (if at all there might be upside) over longer period of  time with much greater tax efficiency </li>
<li>SWP  should be preferred even over monthly or quarterly dividend payouts as dividend  payouts attract DDT at 14% for individual &amp; 22% for corporate (v/s only  2-5% tax outflows under SWP). As can be seen from tables above, there is minimal  tax outgo if one adopts SWP rather than receiving dividends or interest</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/02/04/swp-from-mip-a-powerful-investment-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Article in Economic Times Delhi</title>
		<link>http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/02/03/article-in-economic-times-delhi-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/02/03/article-in-economic-times-delhi-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunil Jhaveri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debt Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mutual Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquid funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutual fund industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msjcapital.com/?p=585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[











&#160;
&#160;
&#160;


Related posts:Article in Economic Times Delhi  SOURCE : Economic Times &#8211; Delhi &#8211; Page 11...
ARTICLE IN ECONOMIC TIMES DELHI  &#160; &#160; &#160; ...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/01/18/article-in-economic-times-delhi/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Article in Economic Times Delhi'>Article in Economic Times Delhi</a> <small> SOURCE : Economic Times &#8211; Delhi &#8211; Page 11...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/02/24/article-in-economic-times-delhi-3/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: ARTICLE IN ECONOMIC TIMES DELHI'>ARTICLE IN ECONOMIC TIMES DELHI</a> <small> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; ...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="300" border="1" bordercolor="#000000" style="text-align: center; height: 310px; margin: auto;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="145">
<div><a href="http://www.msjcapital.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ET-Delhi-3Feb10_Page_1.jpg" target="_blank"><img longdesc="http://www.msjcapital.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ET-Delhi-3Feb10_Page_1.jpg" src="http://www.msjcapital.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ET-Delhi-3Feb10_Page_1-121x300.jpg" alt="ET Clipping 1" width="121" height="300" /></a></div>
</td>
<td width="139">
<div><a href="http://www.msjcapital.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ET-Delhi-3Feb10_Page_2.jpg" target="_blank"><img longdesc="http://www.msjcapital.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ET-Delhi-3Feb10_Page_2.jpg" src="http://www.msjcapital.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ET-Delhi-3Feb10_Page_2-111x300.jpg" alt="ET Clipping 2" width="111" height="300" /></a></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/01/18/article-in-economic-times-delhi/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Article in Economic Times Delhi'>Article in Economic Times Delhi</a> <small> SOURCE : Economic Times &#8211; Delhi &#8211; Page 11...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/02/24/article-in-economic-times-delhi-3/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: ARTICLE IN ECONOMIC TIMES DELHI'>ARTICLE IN ECONOMIC TIMES DELHI</a> <small> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; ...</small></li>
</ol></p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/02/03/article-in-economic-times-delhi-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Guideline by SEBI for Debt and Money Market Instruments</title>
		<link>http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/02/02/new-guideline-by-sebi-for-debt-and-money-market-instruments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/02/02/new-guideline-by-sebi-for-debt-and-money-market-instruments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunil Jhaveri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debt Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sebi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msjcapital.com/?p=577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please refer to my note on Templeton Floating Rate Fund. I had referred to SEBI&#8217;s new guidelines for valuing securities which was in the pipeline and was expected to come into effect from 1st April 2010. SEBI has today come out with a notification to that effect which is going to come into effect from [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/03/03/debt-markets-journey-post-budget/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: DEBT MARKETS JOURNEY POST BUDGET'>DEBT MARKETS JOURNEY POST BUDGET</a> <small>I have not written on debt markets since almost January...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2009/08/21/some-more-interesting-analysis-of-fortis-flexi-debt-during-voliatile-debt-market-in-year-2008/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: SOME MORE INTERESTING ANALYSIS OF FORTIS FLEXI DEBT DURING VOLIATILE DEBT MARKET IN YEAR 2008'>SOME MORE INTERESTING ANALYSIS OF FORTIS FLEXI DEBT DURING VOLIATILE DEBT MARKET IN YEAR 2008</a> <small> Inspite of many reassurances by RBI on raising funds...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2009/04/08/borrowing-calendar-for-current-fiscal-other-factors-affecting-debt-market/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BORROWING CALENDAR FOR CURRENT FISCAL &amp; OTHER FACTORS AFFECTING DEBT MARKET'>BORROWING CALENDAR FOR CURRENT FISCAL &amp; OTHER FACTORS AFFECTING DEBT MARKET</a> <small>Yield Curve post the announcement of Borrowing Calendar for the...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Please refer to my note on <a title="Templeton Floating Rate Fund" href="http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/01/28/an-alternate-asset-class-between-liquid-plus-short-term-plans/" target="_blank">Templeton Floating Rate Fund</a>. I had referred to SEBI&#8217;s new guidelines for valuing securities which was in the pipeline and was expected to come into effect from 1st April 2010. SEBI has today come out with a notification to that effect which is going to come into effect from 1st July 2010.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Just wanted to bring this to the notice of all my esteemed investors.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Hence one part of the expectation which was going to impact liquid plus schemes is already in place. Another negative impact will happen if and when DDT on debt schemes is increased from 22% to 28%.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a title="SEBI Circular" href="http://www.sebi.gov.in/circulars/2010/imdcir162010.pdf" target="_blank">Please click here for the original notification</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/03/03/debt-markets-journey-post-budget/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: DEBT MARKETS JOURNEY POST BUDGET'>DEBT MARKETS JOURNEY POST BUDGET</a> <small>I have not written on debt markets since almost January...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2009/08/21/some-more-interesting-analysis-of-fortis-flexi-debt-during-voliatile-debt-market-in-year-2008/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: SOME MORE INTERESTING ANALYSIS OF FORTIS FLEXI DEBT DURING VOLIATILE DEBT MARKET IN YEAR 2008'>SOME MORE INTERESTING ANALYSIS OF FORTIS FLEXI DEBT DURING VOLIATILE DEBT MARKET IN YEAR 2008</a> <small> Inspite of many reassurances by RBI on raising funds...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.msjcapital.com/2009/04/08/borrowing-calendar-for-current-fiscal-other-factors-affecting-debt-market/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BORROWING CALENDAR FOR CURRENT FISCAL &amp; OTHER FACTORS AFFECTING DEBT MARKET'>BORROWING CALENDAR FOR CURRENT FISCAL &amp; OTHER FACTORS AFFECTING DEBT MARKET</a> <small>Yield Curve post the announcement of Borrowing Calendar for the...</small></li>
</ol></p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msjcapital.com/2010/02/02/new-guideline-by-sebi-for-debt-and-money-market-instruments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
