SWP from MIP-A Powerful Investment Strategy

By Sunil Jhaveri · Thursday, February 4th, 2010 · No Comments »

Every year combination of rising inflation, volatile debt & equity markets & lower/ higher interest yields is creating havoc in portfolios of an individual. An investor who wishes to have regular flow of income; be it a retail, HNI, Pensioner or a Senior Citizen is at a loss  as to how to plan their day to day expenditure with a matching or higher yielding investment portfolio. Either they have to keep on reshuffling their asset classes to make their ends meet or take unnecessary risk in their portfolio (with no guarantee of it giving positive returns at the end of the year) to earn that extra bit of money.

Other alternative is parking their funds in Fixed Deposits with some assured returns but a very tax in efficient vehicle (as the investor will have to pay full tax on interest). Also, in FDs, funds get stuck for a period of time like 1/2/3/5 years & hence, the investor loses on liquidity as well. Also, the principal amount at the end of the FD tenor does not appreciate & the investor gets back the same amount which he/she would have invested at the beginning of the period. Also, many times these returns do not even beat the inflation.

In such a scenario, the investor who wishes to earn a regular income is at a tremendous loss in terms of options available to him to earn regular income to meet his day to day expenses. However, one strategy that can help an investor overcome all the above viz:

  • Have regular & assured  flow of income
  • Make these withdrawals tax efficient &
  • Have a possibility of enhancing the overall portfolio value (over a period of time)

Is SYSTEMATIC WITHDRWAL PLAN from well managed MONTHLY INCOME PLANs. This tool, besides being an extremely tax efficient way of having regular cash flow for the investor also has a capability of enhancing the overall portfolio value (if managed well & withdrawals of the investor on an ongoing basis is less than the overall returns of the scheme i.e. if the scheme has performed say 12% p.a. in one year & the investor has only done SWP of say 8.50% p.a.; then the investor besides withdrawing regular sums through SWP is also enhancing their overall portfolio value).

Following analysis of two of the best managed MIPs viz. Reliance Monthly Income Plan & ICICI Prudential Monthly Income Plan will show case how SWPs score over traditional FDs in terms of returns & tax efficiencies over a period of time. The way the following table are designed are based on an original investment value of Rs.10 lacs at their respective NAVs & SWP @8.50% p.a. i.e. Rs.7100/- p.m.  :

  • It will show the original investment value of Rs.10 lacs as on say Jan 2001 or Jan 2008 at the NAVs prevalent on those dates
  • It will show the values one year hence with tax implications on SWP & on FDs
  • It will show value as on the current date i.e. January 2010 with total withdrawal from say Jan 2001 to Jan 2010/ Jan 2008 to Jan 2010,etc, with long term/short term capital gains tax on SWP & assuming the same returns in FD, its current value and tax implications on the same
  • Most of the years & observations , you will notice that on Year on Year basis (inspite of SWP @8.50% p.a./i.e. Rs.7100/- pm) your principal is either higher or marginally lower (2008 year

being an exception as equity markets had collapsed in that year)  from the start & the investor has paid very little tax compared to tax implications on FD interest

  • Most of the years even on cumulative basis from say 2001 to 2010 or 2008 to 2010,etc years, the current value of your investments in MIPs (inspite of having SWP @8.50% p.a.)is higher than when the investor had started with. This also with much lower tax implication (assuming that the investor is redeeming from MIP in Jan 2010) than what he would have ended up paying as tax on similar interest rate on FDs
  • Reliance MIP data is from 2001 as the said scheme’s date of inception was November 2000 & that of ICICI Prudential is from January 2004:

ANALYSIS OF RELIANCE MIP SINCE  JAN 2001:

FROM

 

VALUE

SWP

TOTAL SWP

TAX IMPLICATION ON SWP & REDEMPTION IN JAN 2010

Jan-01

 

1000000

7100

 

 

Jan-02

Y ON Y

1,025,196

 

85,200

1526

Jan-10

CUMULATIVE

1,142,011

 

766,800

41161

IF INVESTED IN FD

 

VALUE

INTEREST

 

 

Jan-01

 

1000000

7100

 

 

Jan-02

Y ON Y

1000000

 

85,200

25560

Jan-10

CUMULATIVE

1000000

 

766,800

230040

As can be seen from above on Y on Y i.e. from Jan 2001 to Jan 2002 value of your MIP after Rs.85,200/- as SWP is worth Rs.11,42,011 with tax implication of only Rs.1,526 v/s tax implication of Rs. 25,560/-  in FDs . On cumulative basis since Jan 2001 till Jan 2010, an investors has don an SWP of Rs.7,66,800/- having total tax implication of Rs.41,161/- (including Short Term & Long Term & again assuming that the investor is redeeming from MIP at CV of Rs.11,42,011/-) v/s same interest of Rs.7,66,800/- on FD  having an a tax implication of Rs.2,30,040/-.

ANALYSIS OF RELIANCE MIP SINCE JAN 2008: YEAR WHEN EQUITY MARKETS CRASHED:

FROM

 

VALUE

SWP

TOTAL SWP

TAX IMPLICATION ON SWP & REDEMPTION IN JAN 2010

CV WITH TAX IMPLICATIONS & WITHDRWALAS

Jan-08

 

1000000

7100

 

 

 

Jan-09

Y ON Y

896,969

 

85,200

0

 

Jan-10

CUMULATIVE

916,047

 

170,400

0

1086447

IF INVESTED IN FD

 

VALUE

INTEREST

 

 

 

Jan-08

 

1000000

7100

 

 

 

Jan-09

Y ON Y

1000000

 

85,200

25560

 

Jan-10

CUMULATIVE

1000000

 

170,400

51120

1119280

As can be seen from above on Y on Y i.e. from Jan 2008 to Jan 2009 value of your MIP after Rs.85200/- as SWP is lower at Rs.8,96,969/- with no tax implication (due to loss). However, on cumulative basis from Jan 2008 to Jan 2010, value of your MIP has grown to Rs.9,16,047/- with no tax implication (due to losses). Total value of your investment in MIP plus withdrawal is Rs.10,86,447/- v/s total value of FDs plus interest less tax is marginally higher at Rs.11,19,280/-

ANALYSIS OF ICICI PRU MIP SINCE  JAN 2004:

FROM

 

VALUE

SWP

TOTAL SWP

TAX IMPLICATION ON SWP & REDEMPTION IN JAN 2010

Jan-04

 

1000000

7100

 

 

Jan-05

Y ON Y

965,706

 

85,200

450

Jan-10

CUMULATIVE

1,215,317

 

511,200

33762

IF INVESTED IN FD

 

VALUE

INTEREST

 

 

Jan-01

 

1000000

7100

 

 

Jan-02

Y ON Y

1000000

 

85,200

25560

Jan-10

CUMULATIVE

1000000

 

511,200

153360

As can be seen from above on Y on Y i.e. from Jan 2004 to Jan 2005 value of your MIP after Rs.85,200/- as SWP is worth Rs.9,56,706/-  with tax implication of only Rs.450/- v/s tax implication of Rs. 25,560 in FDs . On cumulative basis since Jan 2004 till Jan 2010, an investors has done an SWP of Rs.5,11,200/- having total tax implication of Rs.33,762/- (including Short Term & Long Term & again assuming that the investor is redeeming from MIP at CV of Rs.12,15,317/-) v/s same interest of Rs.5,11,200/- on FD  having a tax implication of Rs.1,53,360/-.

ANALYSIS OF ICICI PRU MIP SINCE JAN 2008: YEAR WHEN EQUITY MARKETS CRASHED:

FROM

 

VALUE

SWP

TOTAL SWP

TAX IMPLICATION ON SWP & REDEMPTION IN JAN 2010

Jan-08

 

1000000

7100

 

 

Jan-09

Y ON Y

1,001,096

 

85,200

0

Jan-10

CUMULATIVE

1,115,173

 

170,400

12108

IF INVESTED IN FD

 

VALUE

INTEREST

 

 

Jan-08

 

1000000

7100

 

 

Jan-09

Y ON Y

1000000

 

85,200

25560

Jan-10

CUMULATIVE

1000000

 

170,400

51120

As can be seen from above on Y on Y i.e. from Jan 2008 to Jan 2009 value of your MIP after Rs.85200/- as SWP is  at Rs.10,01,096/- with no tax implication v/s similar interest on FD of Rs.85,200/- having a tax implication of Rs.25,560/-. However, on cumulative basis from Jan 2008 to Jan 2010, value of your MIP has grown to Rs.11,15,173/- with  tax implication of Rs.12,108/- after SWP of Rs.1,70,400/- v/s same interest of Rs.1,70,400/- on FD having tax implication of Rs.51,120/-

CONCLUSION:

  • Over longer period of time under SWP, there are chances of withdrawing a decent sum of money at a reasonable rate of yield every month without the overall value going negative with lesser tax implication than if you would have earned the same returns in FDs over the same period
  • Though over shorter periods of time (when equity markets are not doing well); an investor might dip into his principal for some time, good performance in equities at a later date will more than make up for that dip with greater tax efficiency
  • Hence, the said strategy of SWP (assuming a reasonable yield of between 7-8% p.a.) through well managed MIPs can be an effective way of having a regular cash flow without much downside (if at all there might be upside) over longer period of time with much greater tax efficiency
  • SWP should be preferred even over monthly or quarterly dividend payouts as dividend payouts attract DDT at 14% for individual & 22% for corporate (v/s only 2-5% tax outflows under SWP). As can be seen from tables above, there is minimal tax outgo if one adopts SWP rather than receiving dividends or interest

 

 

Bookmark and Share
Topics: MIP · Tags: , ,

Article in Economic Times Delhi

By Sunil Jhaveri · Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010 · No Comments »
ET Clipping 1
ET Clipping 2

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share

New Guideline by SEBI for Debt and Money Market Instruments

By Sunil Jhaveri · Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010 · No Comments »

Please refer to my note on Templeton Floating Rate Fund. I had referred to SEBI’s new guidelines for valuing securities which was in the pipeline and was expected to come into effect from 1st April 2010. SEBI has today come out with a notification to that effect which is going to come into effect from 1st July 2010.

Just wanted to bring this to the notice of all my esteemed investors.

Hence one part of the expectation which was going to impact liquid plus schemes is already in place. Another negative impact will happen if and when DDT on debt schemes is increased from 22% to 28%.

Please click here for the original notification

Bookmark and Share

How Does One Read the Credit Policy Review

By Sunil Jhaveri · Friday, January 29th, 2010 · No Comments »

Whew, RBI Policy Review is behind us. Though there was an unpleasant surprise of 75 bps CRR hike (against market expectation of 50 bps) & there was knee jerk reaction in the equity markets (corrected by more than 300 points post the announcement before settling down & currently (2:20 PM) only 13 points down on the SENSEX), debt markets showed more restraint. 10 year 6.90%, 2019 went up marginally to 7.73% (pre policy levels of 7.69%), it has settled back at around the same levels. Also, against market expectations of short end of the yield curve going up, there has been only marginal move of 2-3 bps in this segment of the curve. 3 year paper of PFC which was traded at 7.48/50 % levels pre policy has marginally moved upto 7.50/52% & 5 year PFC has moved up marginally from 8.28/30% levels to 8.30/32% levels.

Though short and medium term rates have not moved up today, the same will start inching up closer to dates of CRR hikes in February. Same will be the case when advance tax outflows kick in during March 2010. This is the time when yield curve will start to flatten from its current steepness (when 1-5 year yields will start moving up). Long end of the curve is (as expected) not likely to be impacted so much.

What were the key announcements & Forecasts?:

  • Reverse REPO unchanged at 3.25%
  • REPO Rate unchanged at 4.75%
  • CRR hike of 75 bps taking CRR to 5.75%
  • CRR to suck out excess liquidity to the tune of Rs.36,000 crs in two tranches viz.50 bps by February 13 & 25 bps by February 27
  • GDP growth forecast upped from 6% to 7.50% for FY 2010
  • Inflation forecast for March upped to 8.50%
  • Credit Growth forecast lowered from 18 to 16%

How does one read into RBI’s move of increasing CRR by 75 bps & not touching the benchmark rates?

  • 75 bps or rather extra 25 bps extra CRR hike is not a cause of concern as 50 bps hike was already priced in
  • RBI is expecting FOREX flows to continue & hence is expecting their intervention to stabilize $/Rs; which in turn will infuse further liquidity in the system. This additional 25 bps hike might be as a preemptive measure to counter this unabetted liquidity flows
  • Systemic liquidity is almost to the tune of Rs.80,000 crs, add to this bank funds parked with MFs in liquid schemes ,add to that surplus in Government account (which is not spent so far- almost to the tune of Rs.50-60,000 crs) add to that FOREX flows. Hence, markets would still be in a comfortable liquidity situation inspite of Rs.36,000 crs getting sucked out due to CRR hike
  • As & when Govt spends that surplus funds in their account on various projects, it will enhance liquidity to that extent
  • As Fiscal Policy measures(like reduction in Service Tax, Excise Duty cuts, etc announced while announcing Fiscal Stimulus to prop the ailing economy)  needed to be complemented with Monetary Policy measures (cut in CRR, Cut in Policy rates, etc); in the same way current reversal of monetary policy measures like hike in CRR will need to be complemented with reversal of Fiscal Measures like hike in taxes, excise duty, etc to achieve the targeted growth of 7.50% & bring down the high Fiscal Deficit numbers of the current year from 6.80% to 5.50-5.75% levels next year
  • Though RBI has given some importance to curtailing rising inflation numbers; they still wish to have a sustained growth numbers to achieve the targeted GDP numbers. Growth cycle is still in its nascent stage. It needs to be accelerated
  • This will surely weigh on the mind of RBI before tinkering with Benchmark rates in the near future. This might be positive for the debt markets
  • Inflation forecast for March 2010 at 8.50% is partly due to food inflation & manufacturing inflation & partly projected on the higher side due to lower base impact of last year. By second quarter of FY 2010, the same is supposed to come down to the comfort zone of RBI, again due to base effect kicking in that time

What are the milestones post this Policy Review which can affect the debt markets?:

  • More than the policy rates or CRR hike, the most important announcement from debt market point of view will be the borrowing calendar that will be announced on February 26’2010 Budget
  • Gross borrowing of Rs.4.50 lac crs is already discounted or priced in. Any number lower than that for following reasons might be viewed positively by the markets:
  1. Fiscal Stimulus roll back like increase in service tax, excise duty hike etc though will be viewed negatively by the equity markets; it will be a positive for the debt markets as that much higher collections will be reported reducing Fiscal Deficit numbers
  2. Higher GDP growth forecast of 7.50% from 6% will be a big booster for debt markets as revenue collections should improve in such a scenario
  3. Also, Govt’s thrust on disinvestment of PSU stocks (which was reiterated by the FM yesterday) alongwith 3G auction numbers should have positive impact on Fiscal numbers
  4. Hopefully, fertilizer & oil subsidy numbers for next year should be on the lower side
  5. Credit pick up forecast  have been lowered by RBI from 18% to 16% & hence, based on that liquidity should not be at a premium in the near future
  6. Lean credit season should kick in post March 2010

Hence, I see this Policy as a sigh of relief as immediate negative news is behind us (without impacting markets too much). Also this should give some insight into the mind of RBI (wherein they wish to see accelerated growth) & hence may not be in a real hurry to increase rates.

Impact of this liquidity tightness during February (when CRR hike takes effect) & advance tax outflows happen in March 2010, will be reflected in Short Term Plans for a short period of time. This asset class will have some negative impact before bouncing back post March 2010. On the other hand, if fiscal numbers for next year are on the positive side (with an assumption that RBI might not raise rates in hurry to achieve accelerated growth), long end of the curve should start rallying post March 2010. Another factor which can impact the long end positively is that Govt has almost finished their borrowing programme for the current year.

 

 

Bookmark and Share
Topics: Policy Views · Tags: , ,

Follow up note to the NFO of AXIS Short Term Plan

By Sunil Jhaveri · Thursday, January 28th, 2010 · No Comments »

Thank you all for investing & supporting the NFO of AXIS Short Term Plan which closed on January 20’2010. The said NFO collected a decent sum of close to Rs.300 crs. As was discussed with most of our investors, 50% of these funds are already invested in 2-5 year corporate bonds & balance 50% is invested in CPs/CDs & cash.

As per the offer document, of the above, upto 30% of the portfolio will stay invested in less than one year maturities. Also, the Fund Manager has taken a tactical call of investing another 20% (out of the allocation earmarked in CP/CD as the same was giving higher carry than parking under CBLO) of the portfolio in medium term debt of 2-5 year segment post the Credit Policy Review tomorrow. If the RBI hikes benchmark rates, he will be able to capture that higher carry.

Inspite of the fact that only 50% of the portfolio is invested in corporate NCDs of 2-5 years, the said portfolio has captured a very decent yield of 6.29% with average maturity of close to 1.75 years. Post the policy, the Fund Manager hopes to increase the Average Maturity to 2 years with gross yield between 6.50% to 6.75%.

Current attributes:

 

INSTRUMENT

RATING

%

1

NCDs

AAA

44.13%

2

CDs

P1+/A1+/PR1+

36.83%

3

CPs

A1+/P1+

10.38%

4

ZERO COUPON

AAA

5.41%

5

CASH

 

3.24%

 

 

 

100%

GROSS YIELD

6.29%

AVG MATURITY

1.75 YRS

RETURNS SINCE INCEPTION I.E. FROM JAN 20 TO JAN 27: 6.73% p.a.

 

 

Bookmark and Share